So many frameworks and diagrams are available on the web to describe the social media phenomenon…

The topic has triggered creativity amongst wanabee BeeCeeGists and Frameworkists, pencils haven been sharpened,… there is some good and some bad:

Here are a few notable, nice and pretty frameworks:

- – - – - – -

> by David Armano

( http://darmano.typepad.com http://davidarmano.posterous.com )

- – - – - – -

> by @Versac:

http://www.meilcour.fr/general/twitter-plafonne.html @Versac

The Graph is from the Chicago Tribune.

Versac’s main point:

The usual comment is : “Facebook is still top, myspace has aged, tired (but keeps the music), and twitter is on the way up…”

Well… the graph would actually show that twitter has reached a plateau after months of intense marketing. According to Versac twitter is definitively great for “a sphere of ‘ultras’, digital living people, deskers and geeks, web developpeurs and connected journalists, people working in hi-tech. nothing for the everyday quidam, who has nothing to do here…”

- – - – - – -

>Versac (bis)

Versac’s stroke of genius in his book “the digital democracy – De la démocratie numérique ” : to articulate 3 territories on the internet.

In details, and in French (i will translate if people are interested…) here -> http://www.spintank.fr/notre-mission/les-3-webs/

- – - – - – -

> Types of Participation on the social web:

http://www.insightbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/myth_participation.jpg

- – - – - – -

> Types of Participation on the social web (by Forrester,… no less):

http://niallfiles.com/public/images/forrester/ladder_small.png

This post is tagged